The End of Salt?
If you thought Britain couldn't deindustrialise any further, well, just look what might be coming next...
Of the six materials I wrote about in Material World, I’d say the one that most people were most surprised about was salt. If you were trying to tell the story of civilisation through a few key minerals then it’s blindingly obvious that you’d have iron and copper in there, and for that matter oil (or another hydrocarbon). But salt…?
However, if you’ve read the book you’ll know that salt is a massively underrated substance. Even today it’s the bedrock for a whole family of chemicals we still use for the manufacture of everything from paper and glass to the silicon wafers that become semiconductors and the lithium ion compounds that go into our smartphone and electric car batteries. Even today, salt is at the heart of everything.
All of which is why the film I’ve just made for Sky News strikes particularly hard. The long and short of it is I’ve spent the past few months travelling around the UK, revisiting factories and plants I first visited when I was researching Material World, to take the temperature of Britain’s chemicals sector. What I found was desperately depressing - because the scale of collapse in this industry went even beyond what I expected.
Many of the critical processes I describe in the book - from the manufacture of soda ash to the production of ammonia - are no longer happening in the UK. In the period between my book being written and the time you read this, the plants have shut down. In the case of those two chemicals, this is the first time we haven’t made them in this country in more than a century.
And soon, that might even be true of salt itself. Honestly, it feels crazy to posit this - after all, Britain has never had to rely on imported salt, never in modern civilisation - but we’re on the brink of losing our salt independence.
Anyway, rather than me blather on too much about this here, the main thing I wanted to say was: have a watch of this film. It’s not the most jolly but it is, I think, important. And let me know what you think
I suppose the only other thing I’d say is that this isn’t just about chemicals. It’s about a deeper question. What matters more: to be able to get hold of something cheaply or to be able to make it domestically? That’s not an easy question to answer. But it’s one I’ve been thinking about a lot recently. In fact, I’m in the thick of working on a new project that tries, one way or another, to get to the bottom of that question: why are some things made in one place and not another? Do we really understand the way the world’s networks of supply are really configured? And what does that teach us about the world we’re living in today (and the world we’ll live in in future)?
But that’s for another day. For the time being please do watch the film and spread the word. Britain is, for better or worse, providing the world with a pretty good case study of what deindustrialisation looks like. And far from slowing, the pace has accelerated since I wrote Material World.



Too late a call I think. As the recent AR7 auction made clear, the UK will be saddled with (extortionately) high energy prices for another two decades. Even if the global thinking is shrinking, why would you invest in the UK. Even if a business qualified for the EII, the discount would only be 65% - only twice as expensive.....
Almost worse than energy prices are politicians and civil servants who wouldn't recognise industry if it exploded out of their humanities degree over breakfast.
If local production is important - and if we are reinstating Dad's Army, it really ought to be - then there is a price to be paid. If we could find the cash, I'm not sure we could find the will.
Tax avoiding Jim Ratcliffe (worth £17bn+) registers for tax in Monaco to save £4bn in tax yet Ineos - the world's biggest chemical company and his company - can't afford to invest in new plant without going cap in hand to the taxpayer...